Såpan fortsätter och nu har Hollie fallit ytterligare en nivå.
Jag har haft en konversation med en moderator om saken och skickade det här meddelande tidigare idag
Tyvärr kan man ju inte skicka bilder på HR utan måste ladda upp dem externt men jag skickade det här meddelandet til Hollie i morse (och det var meddelande nummer två om att jag ville ha bort honom därifrån).
ÄR det verkligen svårt att begripa det jag skrev ovan?
Jag har haft en konversation med en moderator om saken och skickade det här meddelande tidigare idag
Jag fick ett svar att de skulle prata med Hollie om saken. Nu har de gjort så och som sagt det här är helt otroligt, människan måste vara sjuk eller något. Hollie påstår alltså att jag inte har bett henom om att ta bort Myosotis.I realise that what I have written can be a bit hard to follow because I'm so upset so everything tends so come in a bug heap. So I will try to make it easier to follow
A short background
The post about ABN (Arabian breeding network) was in it's original shape added as a finished fact. There were no invitation to participate like "please send me information about your horses". Later on I understood that there were what you may call an invitation, in the title. In the title the abbreviation WPN was added. I don't know how many non native English speaker that now about that abbreviation but I definitely didn't.
So to the topic.
On July 20 at19.22 I wrote this
"Sorry but the OP more looks like an finished product. I have no intention to add any horse to this and I really hope that no one adds my horses because I don't want them there as it's administrated now. Maybe you wrote it in haste but for me it looks more like a "we privileged who are in this ABN group". There is no invitation to be a part of it when you deliver it as a fact.
That stud list you talk about is it that one you post from time to time when people asks for studs? I have never in these posts seen that you want others to participate."
I got this answer
July 20 19.28
"I have on many occasions asked members of the Arabian discord if they would participate in gathering information and updating the sheet, however, no one has yet to actually help. I am posting this thread as a reference and so that the information might reach more players who are not active on discord. If you do not wish to participate that is more than okay, no one is going to force you. Please be aware that this is not a stud list, it is a reference so that breeders can more easily see where the current high stats are in a variety of fields across the community. "
The discussion continue a bit but this is the interesting part for this.
As I read this there is a promise that no one has to participate as an answer to my statement that I had no interest to see any of my horses added.
I can confess that I didn’t trusted Holly so I have checked the tread from time to time to see that she (you use she so I will do so to) hadn't added any of them. To my delight I found none and thought that maybe I had judged her wrong.
One day I got a question from one of my breeding partners about if I had changed my mind about this. I said that no I hadn't (even though I thought about doing so). I than got the information that my stallion Myosotis was added not to the tread but to the Google sheet. That was when I get mad, really mad and so sad.
So after your post yesterday I was forced to DM Hollie to ask or rather scream at her that they can't treat people this way. The answer I got confirmed all my first suspicions about her and her way to treat people.
Here is a quote about the promise above
"Please understand, that where I said "If you do not wish to participate that is more than okay, no one is going to force you" was not in any way a promise of any sort. What that statement meant, and I apologize for not making this clearer, is that you were under no obligation to post in the thread requesting to have horses added. Horse profiles are 100% viewable to all players on HR. "
So we can here see that Hollie never had any intentions to keep her promise. Did she only give it to get rid of the problem?
Next quote
"You could have at any point, actually asked me why a horse (I had to go look this horse up as none listed carried your prefix) Silenus was listed on our sheet, rather than attacking me. Silenus was added while he was owned by Invertad after I bred to him. He is listed as a point of reference for his discipline GP."
She says that I should ask her but why didn't she ask me which horse I was talking about. That Silenus was listed was something I know but that was as she says (with the wrong name) Inverterad who listed him and I had no intention to say anything about that. I can't demand of people to be mind readers.
She also add this
"As it is I have gone out of my way to exclude your currently owned horses from the listings, which is rather sad because it skews the data."
The interesting thing is that she did not remove Myosotis that is bred by me and owned by me and she did neither remove Silenus. So how did she go out of her way?
So here we have a second lie and also a lot of pitying that she had to do such hard work (instead of asking)
Yes I know that I'm talking in a bad way about her but I already on discord got the feeling that this is a person that will let her light shine on you if you go on your back in front of her showing your throat, wagging your tail and praying to her as a master. (I have left the Arabian discord because that was not a nice place to be)
And as a conclusion both Silenus (that I don't care about more than as a proven lie) and Myosotis are still in the Google sheet. I checked only a few minutes ago.
You asked me if I had asked her to remove the horse and I did. But I think that with her original promise I shouldn't have to ask for that she should just remove them immediately.
Tyvärr kan man ju inte skicka bilder på HR utan måste ladda upp dem externt men jag skickade det här meddelandet til Hollie i morse (och det var meddelande nummer två om att jag ville ha bort honom därifrån).
ÄR det verkligen svårt att begripa det jag skrev ovan?