Men snälla du, på en flicka förstörs könet totalt och prickar du klitoris tar du bort njutningen och det ju också det som är den vidriga grundtanken.
På pojkar tas en bit hud bort som öht inte sargar själva penis utan snarare "förbättrar" hygien & samlagsmässigt.
HUR är dessa företeelser lika mer än att barnet inte får välja? Hade du velat sarga din dotters kön och i samma veva förbättra din sons och kalla det "lika inför lagen"?
Vill bara påpeka att oavsett är det ett medvetet övergrepp mot ett barn men tycker också att resultatet är ett förstört liv för flickorna och i många fall ett bättre för männen väger in.
Wikipedia,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision
"Circumcision did not become a common medical procedure in the Anglophone world until the late 19th century.
[85] At that time, British and American doctors began recommending it primarily as a deterrent to masturbation"
"In 1855, motivated in part by an interest in promoting circumcision to reduce masturbation, English physician
Jonathan Hutchinson published his findings that Jews had a lower prevalence of certain venereal diseases"
"In America, one of the first modern physicians to advocate the procedure was
Lewis Sayre, a founder of the
American Medical Association. In 1870, Sayre began using circumcision as a purported cure for several cases of young boys diagnosed with paralysis or significant motor problems. He thought the procedure ameliorated such problems based on a "reflex neurosis" theory of disease, which held that excessive stimulation of the genitals was a disturbance to the equilibrium of the nervous system and a cause of systemic problems."
Huffington post,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-earp/does-circumcision-reduce-_b_9743242.html
"Lesson #1. The foreskin is
part of the penis. It is made up of sensitive tissue (more on this below); so if you remove it, the penis loses sensitivity by definition. Specifically, it loses all of the sensitivity experienced
in the foreskin itself, along with all subjective sensations that are unique to having a foreskin."
"Lesson #3. The United States is the
only developed country that practices routine circumcision on a majority of newborn boys for non-religious reasons. Circumcision in this context is often described as “just a little snip,” and the foreskin as “a tiny flap of skin.” I won’t go into the details of what a circumcision surgery actually involves (
here is a video for those who are not too squeamish), but “little snip” is not an accurate description.
As for the foreskin itself, it is not a “flap of skin,” but rather a double-layered, retractable, invertible sheath of tissue that functions seamlessly with the rest of the penis (
here’s another video); and it’s only “tiny” when it’s connected to a baby. The adult foreskin has on average
30 to 50 square centimeters of tissue surface area (roughly the size of a credit card), with numerous
specialized nerve endings that respond to tactile stimulation."
"But I still don’t see how the conclusion follows. It sounds like the foreskin is acutely sensitive to the lightest and most gentle of touches (as well as to mild sensations of warmth), while being somewhat less sensitive to outright pain. Is that supposed to count against the foreskin?"
"In the meantime, a precautionary approach suggests that we should leave boys’ penises alone until they can assess the sensitivity of their own foreskins as compared to other parts of the penis—as well as their role in sexual experience more generally—in light of their own considered sexual preferences and values."
